Market contextSpreadsheets are excellent general-purpose tools, which is why many teams start there. The problem is not the spreadsheet itself; the problem is using a flexible grid as the source of truth for resumes, reviewer notes, shortlist decisions, and stage movement once hiring volume grows.
Spreadsheets are strong collaboration tools, not purpose-built hiring systems
Google Sheets emphasizes real-time collaboration, sharing, and spreadsheet editing from anywhere. That makes it useful for simple hiring lists, but it still leaves resume evidence, screening criteria, and stage history for the team to design and maintain manually.
Source: Google Sheets product overviewExcel can support shared tracking, but process structure is still manual
Microsoft documents co-authoring for Excel workbooks, which helps multiple people work in the same file. For recruiting, the missing layer is not collaboration alone; it is consistent candidate screening, searchable resume records, and clear shortlist reasoning.
Source: Microsoft Excel co-authoringSpreadsheet-style tracking is common in recruiting, especially early on
SHRM provides an applicant flow log spreadsheet, which shows why spreadsheet tracking is a familiar starting point for recruiting administration. It can document activity, but it does not replace a screening workflow when resumes and roles multiply.
Source: SHRM applicant flow log spreadsheetATS workflows are built to organize hiring from end to end
SHRM describes applicant tracking systems as tools that help recruiting teams streamline job posting, application screening, candidate communication, and related hiring steps. That is the line where a spreadsheet tracker starts becoming a constraint rather than a shortcut.
Source: SHRM on applicant tracking systems